Identity has been a huge theme in
this semester’s books, from Howie to Clarissa to Jake to Gregor to Meursault to
Antoinette, and lastly, to Milkman. In several of
the books there have been key scenes in which the characters view themselves in
a mirror and have some sort of major self-reflection: When Clarissa “assembles”
herself in front of the mirror, when Meursault glances in the mirror and only
notices the corner edge of a table, the “looking-glass” references in Wide Sargasso Sea, etc are all important
moments that really show the protagonist’s character (or lack thereof) and
their own view of themselves. In Song of Solomon Milkman has a similar
experience:
Milkman stood before his mirror and
glanced, in the low light of the wall lamp, at his reflection. He was, as usual, unimpressed with what he
saw. He had a fine enough face. Eyes women complimented him on, a firm jaw
line, splendid teeth. Taken apart, it
looked all right. Even better than all
right. But it lacked coherence, a coming
together of the features into a total self.
It was all very tentative, the way he looked, like a man peeping around
a corner of someplace he is not supposed to be, trying to make up his mind whether
to go forward or to turn back. The
decision he made would be extremely important, but the way in which he made the
decision would be careless, haphazard, and uninformed. (70)
Milkman’s
life from the outside looks fine, even better than fine, but on the inside he
lacks a clear identity. All the tiny
parts of Milkman’s life seem normal, but he hasn’t figured out how to put them
together to create who he really is. He
has been told all these little bits and pieces of his family’s past from his
father, mother, and Pilate, but has no definite truths that he can hold
onto.
This one paragraph has so much more
meaning after finishing the book than when I initially read it. Milkman’s indecision to “go forward” to
“someplace he is not supposed to be” seems to be a clear reference to him
breaking into Pilate’s house and his quest for the gold. The uninformed
decision he makes could be how he breaks up with Hagar. It is an extremely important decision, even
costing Hagar’s life, and is most definitely careless, haphazard, and
uninformed. This whole passage is extremely interesting in
comparison with how Hagar reacts to seeing herself in the mirror. He does not
care nearly as much and does not seem
to really have a problem that he lacks a “total self”. The “tentativeness” of his face also applies
to his approach to all of his decisions.
He never truly makes a decision for himself in the entire novel besides
hitting his father. Morrison notes this when
he is arguing with Guitar about how they are going to steal the gold from
Pilate:
He felt a self inside himself emerge, a
clean-lined definite self. A self that
could join the choruses at Railroad Tommy’s with more than laughter. He could tell this. The only real confrontation he’d had was
hitting his father, but that wasn’t the kind of story that stirred the glitter
up in the eyes of the old men in Tommy’s. (184)
The
gold not only drives the plot of the novel, but gives Milkman a sense of purpose and like he points out here, a
sense of self. Milkman’s identity is formed through his quest for the gold, and
more importantly, for his family’s history.
Identity will always play a big role in any character with depth. I think that the use of a mirror is simply a good way to physically call that idea to mind, in the minds of the readers and in the ind of the character
ReplyDeleteThat scene with Milkman examining his face in the mirror always reminds me of Clarissa "assembling her self." We have the character alone, trying to imagine how he's seen by others. The next key scene, when his sense of identity starts to gain focus as he plots with Guitar (a scene I'd wanted to discuss in class), furthers this process, and there's some kind of progression here, working toward the key moment in the woods where he's all alone, in the dark, and his sense of self slips away and he contemplates his existence apart from all social trappings. This existential moment in the woods is key to the emergence of Milkman's character, and there's some kind of progression here from quasi-narcissism to utter self-lessnes.
ReplyDeleteWow James, this is a great insight! Wish we'd had you in class to share it during the panel presentation today (Jk, <3). But seriously, I think its significant that every book we've read so far has dealt with identity in some way or another. Jake's identity as impotent, Gregor's identity as a bug-boy, and so on. I guess its an especially important 20th century theme? I can get behind that idea.
ReplyDelete