Throughout the
novel I have felt a sense of unease, frustration, and fear towards Sylvie’s
character. This has confused me in many
regards, but mostly because I couldn’t quite figure out what creeped me out so
much about her. I was intrigued by her
philosophy towards life and really enjoyed trying to wrap my head around how on
a geological scale everything human civilization does is just a little *blip* in the water (like the train sliding
into the lake [like a weasel]). Everything we give purpose to in society
eventually will recede back into the lake as nature takes control. But Sylvie, unlike me, is not disturbed by
the purposelessness of society and accepts that into her own life. Sylvie’s purposelessness initially was what
bothered me the most about her, but looking back on the novel as a whole I was
most freaked out by something far simpler than that: her happiness.
Many times in class Mr.
Mitchell has eluded to how at peace Sylvie is and how happy she seems in the
most uncomfortable of situations, which I read off initially as simply aloof
dreaminess. How can one be happy without
purpose? Our society shuns and
discourages purposelessness for very good reasons. Biologically our purpose is simple: to make
sure the human race survives. Yet, what
is the point in that survival? Eventually all will be gone, whether North
Korea/Trump nuke the entire planet in the next four years or we last for the
next ten thousand, it will all be the same. So, in response to the inevitability of our
eventual demise we find meaning and purpose by conforming to society’s
standards and comforts (and discomforts!).
Yet Sylvie is able to reject
these societal confirmations, accept the inevitability of life, and be happy. That being said, I think someone who does not
see purpose in life is not necessarily the best person to look after children
from a “safety” perspective and emotional
perspective. What I find especially
interesting is how Sylvie finds *purpose* once she knows Ruth might be taken
away – a sign that she really does care
and love Ruth just in ways that are so foreign to our society’s standards it is
hard to wrap our heads around it.
I was also a little disturbed by the way Sylvie acts in this book. She does seem happy and it is interesting that she can go through hardships, like the lake rising up and flooding the house, and seem completely at peace with it. At the same time, it is hard to imagine being a child under her care and having to live in an environment where you weren't being taken care of because your guardian didn't have a sense of responsibility for your upbringing, especially if, like Lucille, you don't agree with her ideas.
ReplyDeleteAnd I think it is even scarier from my perspective of seeing kids being raised in an "unsafe" manner from our "societal standards" that I think this novel has made me question
DeleteI feel the same way you do. I think I've overlooked some of Sylvie's behaviors mainly since we have accepted her as aloof and quirky. But honestly, if I was a . child, I would be pretty disturbed when she disappeared without warning or would not answer if I called her name. Your post actually made me sympathize with Lucille more. Besides Sylvie's unconventional manners, I wouldn't really feel confident with Sylvie as my only guardian.
ReplyDeleteAnd yet I think that Sylvie's unconventional manner brings up some very good questions about how the way our perspective is slightly problematic in our ignoring of the transience of life
DeleteAlthough Sylvie's lifestyle can seem appealing at times (like the way she always seems to completely carefree), I definitely agree that it is also a scary way to live. Someone who lives like Sylvie does may not be the best person to take care of children as she is in her own world most of the time.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Shreya. Sylvia's lifestyle is cool and happily carefree, and that's great... but maybe not for someone who is liking after children. Thankfully, at least one out of the two--Ruth--was okay with Sylvie's way of living, and decided that that so happened to be the kind of life she wanted to life too.
DeleteAnd I think that Ruth's relationship with Sylvie is also very positive for Sylvie in that she has some type of "stability" in a relationship that they can be "openly transient" with each other
Delete