Friday, March 31, 2017

Sylvie Freaks Me Out (in a possibly positive way)

Throughout the novel I have felt a sense of unease, frustration, and fear towards Sylvie’s character.  This has confused me in many regards, but mostly because I couldn’t quite figure out what creeped me out so much about her.  I was intrigued by her philosophy towards life and really enjoyed trying to wrap my head around how on a geological scale everything human civilization does is just a little *blip* in the water (like the train sliding into the lake [like a weasel]). Everything we give purpose to in society eventually will recede back into the lake as nature takes control.  But Sylvie, unlike me, is not disturbed by the purposelessness of society and accepts that into her own life.  Sylvie’s purposelessness initially was what bothered me the most about her, but looking back on the novel as a whole I was most freaked out by something far simpler than that: her happiness.
            Many times in class Mr. Mitchell has eluded to how at peace Sylvie is and how happy she seems in the most uncomfortable of situations, which I read off initially as simply aloof dreaminess.  How can one be happy without purpose?  Our society shuns and discourages purposelessness for very good reasons.  Biologically our purpose is simple: to make sure the human race survives.  Yet, what is the point in that survival?  Eventually all will be gone, whether North Korea/Trump nuke the entire planet in the next four years or we last for the next ten thousand, it will all be the same.  So, in response to the inevitability of our eventual demise we find meaning and purpose by conforming to society’s standards and comforts (and discomforts!).   Yet Sylvie is able to reject these societal confirmations, accept the inevitability of life, and be happy.  That being said, I think someone who does not see purpose in life is not necessarily the best person to look after children from a “safety” perspective and emotional perspective.  What I find especially interesting is how Sylvie finds *purpose* once she knows Ruth might be taken away – a sign that she really does care and love Ruth just in ways that are so foreign to our society’s standards it is hard to wrap our heads around it.
  

7 comments:

  1. I was also a little disturbed by the way Sylvie acts in this book. She does seem happy and it is interesting that she can go through hardships, like the lake rising up and flooding the house, and seem completely at peace with it. At the same time, it is hard to imagine being a child under her care and having to live in an environment where you weren't being taken care of because your guardian didn't have a sense of responsibility for your upbringing, especially if, like Lucille, you don't agree with her ideas.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And I think it is even scarier from my perspective of seeing kids being raised in an "unsafe" manner from our "societal standards" that I think this novel has made me question

      Delete
  2. I feel the same way you do. I think I've overlooked some of Sylvie's behaviors mainly since we have accepted her as aloof and quirky. But honestly, if I was a . child, I would be pretty disturbed when she disappeared without warning or would not answer if I called her name. Your post actually made me sympathize with Lucille more. Besides Sylvie's unconventional manners, I wouldn't really feel confident with Sylvie as my only guardian.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And yet I think that Sylvie's unconventional manner brings up some very good questions about how the way our perspective is slightly problematic in our ignoring of the transience of life

      Delete
  3. Although Sylvie's lifestyle can seem appealing at times (like the way she always seems to completely carefree), I definitely agree that it is also a scary way to live. Someone who lives like Sylvie does may not be the best person to take care of children as she is in her own world most of the time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with Shreya. Sylvia's lifestyle is cool and happily carefree, and that's great... but maybe not for someone who is liking after children. Thankfully, at least one out of the two--Ruth--was okay with Sylvie's way of living, and decided that that so happened to be the kind of life she wanted to life too.

      Delete
    2. And I think that Ruth's relationship with Sylvie is also very positive for Sylvie in that she has some type of "stability" in a relationship that they can be "openly transient" with each other

      Delete